Me, 101
I have no idea what the current definition of blogging is, mostly because I’m too lazy to look it up, but there are more candidates now than there were. It doesn’t seem to be defined by frequency of posts, subject matter, purpose, point or perspective, although they’re all there. I read ellipse blogs (my term, thank you very much, meaning dot-dot-dot/Walter Winchell/brief notes, many of them), political blogs, summary blogs, journaling blogs and just overall personal blogs, and enjoy them all (or I stop reading).
Even “personal” is hard to cage up, since there are several bloggers on my own list who write about their lives in their own ways with their own charming and idiosyncratic and unique styles, doing essentially what I get paid to do except me maybe not so much with the charm, depends.
And there are a lot of recovering addicts, some of whom I read, some of whom I’ve stopped reading. I understand their motivation to write about this particular and overwhelming aspect of their lives; I’ve certainly done my share (I’m doing it right now, just wait), and I understand the therapeutic value in getting this serious shit out there, out of our brains and psyches and stomachs and out there, exposed to the light of day and maybe somebody else.
But it can get old, and not very interesting, and thus we’re back to the paradigm question: Why do you write, for whom and for what reason? It’s important to you; as a reader, maybe not to me.
I’ve always appreciated (and stolen, from time to time) a thought from Garrison Keillor, who wrote a wonderful article for The Atlantic years ago on judging a poetry contest. “It’s not fair to bore someone when they can’t bore you right back” was the gist, although the quotation marks are just penance for me since, again, I’ve stolen the sentiment more than once. I don’t want to bore you. Still, along with my own therapeutic needs, I get overwhelmed by a desire to explain; as I’ve said before, I have a pretty strong apologist streak.
So prepare to skim, or stop. No hard feelings. Although I’ll aim for brevity.
The best thing I did was read “Staying Sober” by Terrence Gorski in the months following my last drink. It was recommended to me as I left treatment, an odd choice but possibly a lifesaver, if you’re willing to extrapolate a little. Gorski early on in his career in addiction medicine became interested in relapse prevention, a subspecialty of chemical dependency treatment, and “Staying Sober” is essentially a textbook.
(I’m going to use “addiction” and “chemical dependency” interchangeably here because I’m lazy, although I’m talking mostly about the latter; the former has come to mean a lot of different things and represent a lot of different behaviors, a subject for purists and narcissists if you ask me, which you didn’t, of course.)
Biological, psychological, social: These are the basic three areas affected by addiction, and why preventing relapse (which seems obvious, and then sometimes is ruled off the table in some recovery circles) is tricky. The brain physically changes by prolonged use of chemicals; whether it changes back is a question. I assume it doesn’t, just to keep it simple. So neurochemistry speaking, there are some serious messages out there for an addict, leading him/her to all the wrong places.
Social is pretty obvious, which is why changing lifestyles completely is important. Sometimes friends have to be let go, etc.
Psychologically, we’re just all too human. Six months into sobriety, when lots are lost, we get cocky, maybe, or delusional, or maybe just desperate. So having a plan, a program, support and information are all crucial.
I read this book, then, a couple of times. Gorski’s initial surprise in his practice was realizing that the process of relapse is usually undetectable in the beginning, unless you know what to look for. In other words, an addict who’s abstaining from his/her drug of choice might start to do things that are so subtle no one notices, but in retrospect are red flags. Some of these are thought processes or emotional states, but a lot are behaviors.
For example, after a few months of sobriety I began to watch a lot of TV. A LOT. I went from virtually no television watching to six hours or more daily, all of it seemingly innocent and reasonable, and all of it essentially compulsive. Thanks to the book, I saw this. I mentioned it. I stopped it.
And it’s happened over and over since. Some of it may be a case of being too aware, and maybe reading too much into something; other times, it practically leaps out of my body and waves its arms like the robot on “Lost In Space,” an image that right this minute is cracking me up. Warning, Will Robinson, yadda yadda. I call this “addict mode,” and I recognize it now and I’m grateful for that.
I am currently in full-blown addict mode. The point, therefore, of this post. Overdue, too.
It’s a fascinating thing to watch, in a macabre way. I wonder if bipolar people have similar feelings when they start slipping into manic phases, for one, poorly informed example. It started with my sort of spontaneous decision a few weeks ago to quit smoking cigarettes, not very well thought out or planned, and for many, many people a fairly simple if difficult process. In my case, it opened up cans and cans filled with worm-like creatures, awareness and insight and fear and loathing and depression and mania and denial and I’m really boring you about now, right? Or was it a while ago? Just curious.
None of this is particularly life-threatening or even all that obvious, except that I live with two people who surely are aware. And it’s fairly benign, if you look at it casually. Someone is sure watching a lot of videos lately. Someone is sure eating a lot of ice cream lately. Someone is sure cleaning house excessively lately. Someone even cleaned behind the oven. Alert the media.
As I said (and I’m almost finished, but so much for brevity), it’s fascinating to me, watching myself flutter with control. And it’s a good thing that I’m aware, that I’m educated on the subject, that I can see through the haze of obsessive and compulsive behaviors some truth. And, I should add, this is not Emo Chuck, although I can get blue. I’m just saying. And even as severe as this is at the moment, I also have some experiences that might offer me a solution. For one thing, despite the walks and the constant trips to the store, etc., I really, really need to get out of the house more. Call it a delayed winter cabin fever thing.
In other words, I really need to take a trip.
Wow. As luck would have it…
Boston in a week. Just in time.